Thursday, March 18, 2010

Senior Project Rough Draft Essay #2

Diana Barlow

Environmental Science

15 March 2010

Senior Project Rough Draft Essay #2

Ethanol, or ethyl alcohol, (CH3CH2OH) is a renewable fuel made from biomass. Although ethanol production goes as far back as the Industrial Revolution, we still continue to develop new forms of technology for ethanol based fuel today. With concerns over our country outsourcing the majority of our fuel, and the impact these fuels have on our atmosphere, it is concluded that another energy source is needed. A new qualified biofuel has to provide a positive net energy gain, have environmental benefits, be economically competitive, and be producible in large quantities without reducing food supplies (Hill 2006). I argue that the United States should use ethanol as our main energy provider instead of alternative fuels due its applications such as job creation, energy security, and environmental benefits.

We are currently going through “America's Second Great Depression”, with the worst wave of bankruptcies, job losses and financial crisis in history. However with Ethanol, our future is looking brighter then ever. The growing ethanol industry alone, provides a significant contribution to the American economy, creating new high-paying jobs, increasing market opportunities for farmers, generating additional household income and tax revenues, and stimulating capital investment (American Coalition for Ethanol). In “2008, The U.S. ethanol industry last year added an additional 240,000 jobs, bringing the employment attributable to ethanol to almost a half a million” (Renewable Fuels Association). The process itself of creating and distributing corn based ethanol is done by American workers because it is currently only produced in the U.S. The American Coalition of Ethanol claims that “with an approximate cost of $60 million for one year of construction, an ethanol plant expands the local economic base by $110 million each year”. Those are new jobs created due to the increase in ethanol production. “In 2008, ethanol contributed $65 billion to GDP, added $20 billion to household income, and displaced the need for 321 million barrels of oil.” These are only the beginning effects ethanol production can have on our country and the lives of our citizens.

The U.S. imports 65% its petroleum needs today and two-thirds of the world's known oil reserves are located in the volatile Middle East. The U.S. Is increasingly depended on imported forms of energy to supply our needs. The production of ethanol allows the U.S. To become less dependent on foreign energy since it is domestically produced here (Renewable Fuels Association). That would allow the U.S., more control over our own security and future because we would be in control of our fuel supplies. “By displacing hundreds of millions of barrels of imported oil, the increasing reliance on domestically-produced ethanol is making available billions of dollars for investment in domestic renewable energy technologies” (Renewable Fuels Association).

In the graph it is clearly seen that as the years go by domestic forms of oil decrease while there is a rise in the amount of barrels we import from around the world a day.

Ethanol is an environmentally friendly renewable resource that burns cleaner than gasoline because it consists of 35% oxygen. Adding oxygen to fuels reduces harmful tailpipe emissions and displaces the use of toxic gasoline components such as benzene, a carcinogen. Ethanol is non-toxic, water soluble and highly biodegradable (American Coalition for Ethanol). Ethanol is produced from plants unlike petroleum based fossil fuels that have a limited supply and is a major contributer of carbon dioxide and greenhouse gasses. Because Ethanol is made from renewable, plant-based feedstocks, the carbon dioxide released during a vehicle's fuel combustion is "recycled" by the plant as it grows. “Using ethanol in place of gasoline helps to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by up to 29% given today's technology” (American Coalition for Ethanol), and in 2008, the production and use of nine billion gallons of ethanol in the U.S. reduced CO2-equivalent greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 14 million tons, the equivalent of removing more than 2.1 million cars from America's roadways (Morgon 2008). Ethanol has made a drastic impact on the environment by cutting down on the CO2 emissions and reducing the greenhouse gas emissions by 12% (Hill 2006).

Even with all the benefits we receive with ethanol, the main concern has been questioned whether ethanol will really be an advantage to the economy or not. A problem is that ethanol cannot travel in pipelines like conventional gasoline because it picks up moisture and other impurities in the pipeline. Ethanol can only be transported by trucks, trains, or barges which are more expansive and complicated than using pipelines. This significantly increases transportation costs and as ethanol production increases, the result will be higher ethanol prices (Morgon 2008). Another predicament is that the U.S., does not have the infrastructure to accommodate the widespread ethanol use, which means that we have based our country upon coal and other fossil fuels and the adjustments would be expensive. The Net Energy Balance (NEB) is the biofuel energy content versus the fossil fuel energy inputs. The NEB for corn grain ethanol is small, providing approximately 25% more energy than required for its production.

This chart regards the NEB of corn grain ethanol and soybean biodiesel production. “Energy inputs and outputs are expressed per unit energy of the biofuel. All nine input categories are consistently ordered in each set of inputs, as in the legend, but some are so small as to be nearly indistinguishable. Individual inputs and outputs of ≥0.05 are labeled; values <0.05>Left) and for the biofuel only (Right)” (Hill 2006).

Biodiesel is a renewable, promising alternative fuel derived from vegetable oils and animal fats. The National Biodiesel Board reports that the production of biodiesel is highly efficient: 3.2 units of fuel energy from diesel are created from one unit of fossil energy used in production. Biodiesel is environmentally friendly because it burns cleaner because of the presence of oxygen in the fuel, resulting in fewer toxic emissions that reduce air quality. The National Biodiesel Board also states the numerous economic benefits, including $24 billion added to the U.S., economy by 2015, and resulting in 39,102 new jobs. However, biodiesel's largest problem is producing meaningful quantities of the fuel. Biodiesel certainly looks to be better for the environment, but from an economic standpoint it has several disadvantages over petroleum diesel.

A fuel cell is an “electrochemical device that combines hydrogen and oxygen to produce electricity with water and heat as its byproduct” (Department of Energy). The benefits that come along with fuel cells are that it would cut the U.S., dependence from the oil producing countries, be extremely reliable and efficient, have a 30% greenhouse gas reduction, emit small amounts of CO2, and provide more energy from the same amount of fuel that current conventions use (Bloomer 2003). As nice as that all sounds, there are some faults that come along with the idea. Similar to the other new fuels, a transition from a hydrogen and coal fueled economy to fuel cells would be extremely expensive. Another problem is which to develop first; the fuel or the end use applications. This is beginning to greatly interfere with production of this new technology. Investments will only come if there appears to be a large ROI and ROI only will come once consumers believe that this technology is effective and efficient (Department of Energy).

When compared to other forms of energy such as biodiesel or fuel cells, ethanol surpasses them all. Ethanol is the renewable fuel that benefits our country in so many ways. Citizens can get jobs, the economy rises once again, the U.S., has more control over our fuel sources, and we benefit our environment by not emitting as much carbon dioxide and green house gasses. "America's dependence on oil is one of the most serious threats that our nation has faced. It bankrolls dictators, pays for nuclear proliferation, and funds both sides of our struggle against terrorism. It puts the American people at the mercy of shifting gas prices, stifles innovation and sets back our ability to compete." said by President Barack Obama, January 26, 2009.


References

"American Coalition for Ethanol." ACE. 15 Apr. 2008 .

"RFA - Resource Center - Ethanol Facts." RFA - Renewable Fuels Association. N.p., n.d. Web. 7 Mar. 2010. .

Hill, Jason, Erik Nelson, David Tilman, Stephen Polasky, and Douglas Tiffany. "Environmental, Economic, and Energetic Costs and Benefits of Biodiesel and Ethanol Biofuels." PNAS 103.30 (2006). Print.

Paul, Winters. "Industrial Biotechnology Is Revolutionizing the Production of Ethanol Transportation Fuel." Biotechnology Industry Organization (2008). Web. Feb. 2010.

Morgon, John, William Nickley, Megan Monaco, and Eric Miller. "Alternative Fuel Sources and Their Economic and Environmental Impacts." Dicke College of Business Administration (2008). Print.

Department of Energy. (2006). Fuel Cells. Retrieved April 5, 2008, from US. Department Of Energy Website.<>.

Bloomer, Michael. (2003). Fuel Cell Report to Congress. Retrieved April 5, 2008, from

U.S. Department of Energy .


Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Why Biodiversity is Important Questions.

  1. The argument is that biodiversity is the idea that humans are part of nature.
  2. The anthropocentric belief is that human beings are the sole bearers of intrinsic value or possess greater intrinsic value than non-human nature.
  3. The Noah's principle discusses that the usefulness of a species is not considered when discussing its conversation, but rather its very presence in the long history of evolution is sufficient to warrant its preservation.
  4. I believe it is true because humans had a connection with nature from the beginning of time whether it was with plants or animals. And that connection is pretty natural for us humans to have.
  5. Domesticated agricultural crops, medicines and the clothes we wear.
  6. Air and water purification, climate regulation, and the generation of moisture and oxygen.
  7. Because even a gram of soil still inhabits life.
  8. There is a bias towards the protection of species and ecosystems that have attributable economic value and this perspective may also lead to the conclusion that ecosystems that are not directly benefitting humans are worth more to humans developed than undeveloped.
  9. Because aesthetic value doesn't necessarily hold a lot of biodiversity when its for looks, but this is an argument relevant only to the minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries and holds little to do with the majority of the world's population.
  10. Because a lot of stuff is still unknown. All our goods, spices and medicines have been discovered “accidently” from biodiversity.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Futuristic Energy

While I was in class working, I tried to find sources for my brand new essay topic which is future forms of photosynthesis and energy.

Sassen, Saskia. "THE ECOLOGY OF GLOBAL ECONOMIC POWER: CHANGING INVESTMENT PRACTICES TO PROMOTE ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY." Journal of International Affairs 58.2 (2005): 11 - 23. History Study Center. Web. 4 Mar. 2010.

http://www.historystudycenter.com.sdplproxy.sandiego.gov/search/displayJournalPqProxyAsciiItemById.do?UseMapping=JournalPqProxyAscii&fromPage=toc&QueryName=journal&UniqueIdField=PQID&format=TG&cacheImages=true&collectionsTag=&journalID=6&ItemID=1382721381&PQID=1382721381

I didn't get very far in my attempts of finding lots of sources because both articles took a long time to read through.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Biodiversity - Science Articles

Consequences of Changing Biodiversity

Interesting Quotes

Fossil-fuel combustion and deforestation have increased the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) by 30% in the past three centuries (with more than half of this increase occurring in the past 40 years).”

We have more than doubled the concentration of methane and increased concentrations of other gases that contribute to climate warming.”

In the next century these greenhouse rate as a consequence of human activities. Already we have caused the extinction of 5–20% of the species in many groups of organisms and current rates of extinction are estimated to be 100 1,000 times greater than pre-human rates.”

In the absence of major changes in policy and human behavior, our effects on the environment will continue to alter biodiversity.”

What the Article is About

The article included many informing graphs, such a a graph on the global number of species of birds, mammals, fish and plants that are currently threatened with extinction. Other included graphs showed the ecosystem and societal consequences of change in biodiversity over time.The article is also about how the human impact on the world and how it has triggered the sixth major extinction event in the history, causing so many disruptions in the natural environment. These changes in the biodiversity affected the ecosystems and led to many consequences for the free services we get from nature. We need to preserve our biodiversity for future global environmental problems.


Biodiversity Hotspots for Conservation Priorities

Interesting Quotes

The 25 hotspots contain the remaining habitats of 133,149 plant species (44% of all plant species world-wide; Table 1) and 9,645 vertebrate species (35%; Table 2). These endemics are confined to an aggregate expanse of 2.1 million square kilometres, or 1.4% of the Earth's land surface. They formerly occupied 17.4 million square kilometres or 11.8% of the Earth's land surface. They are so threatened that, having already lost an aggregate of 88% of their primary vegetation, they all seem likely, in the absence of greatly increased conservation efforts, to lose much if not most of their remaining primary vegetation within the foreseeable future.”

We could go far towards safeguarding the hotspots and thus a large proportion of all species at risk for an average of $20 million per hotspot per year over the next five years, or $500 million annually. Although this is 12.5 times the annual average of the $400 million spent on hotspots over the past decade, it is still only twice the cost of a single Pathfinder mission to Mars, which has been justified largely on biodiversity grounds (the search for extraterres-trial life). The $500 million annually is to be compared, moreover, with a recent estimate47 for a comprehensive conservation programme to protect biodiversity world-wide costing $300 billion annuallyÐa total that should, in turn, be compared with subsidies of various sorts that degrade environments and economies alike, amounting to $1.5 trillion annually world-wide.”

What the Article is About

This article was on 'biodiversity hotspots'. Conservationists can not assist all the species under a treat only due to lack of funding, which is why they mapped out the 'biodiversity hotspots' where concentrations of species are going through a large loss of habitat. The idea is to support the most species, at the least cost. As many as 44% of all species of vascular plants and 35% of all species in four vertebrate groups are confined to 25 hotspots comprising only 1.4% of the land surface of the Earth.

Citing My Sources

Chapin III, Stuart, Erika Zavaleta, Michelle Mack, Sandra Díaz, Valerie Eviner, Rosamond Naylor, Peter Vitousek, Heather Reynolds, David Hooper, Sandra Lavorel, Osvaldo Sala, and Sarah Hobbie. "Consequences of changing biodiversity ." Insightreview Articles 11 May 2000: 234-242. Print.

Myers, Norman, Russell Mittermeierē, Cristina Mittermeierē, Gustavo Fonsecaģ, and Jennifer Kent. "Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities ." Nature Feb. 2000: 1-6. Print.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Nathan Lewis Presentation Responce

In the attempts to go about our daily lives, we find ourselves in the midsts of a dying planet. What this means for us, is that our whole existence relies on our planet and all the biodiversity it offers. The problem is trying to figure out an eco-friendly and cheap way to get energy to satisfy the needs of the people. About 85 percent of all energy consumption (including the generation of electricity) comes from oil, gas and coal, with the world consuming about 13 trillion watts of energy every day. All which have let out tremendous amounts of CO2 into our atmosphere over the years. “Fossil energy is the lowest-cost energy we have on the planet today,” Lewis said. “Using the axis of optimization based on cost, it’s pretty clear cost optimization will lead us to rely almost exclusively on fossil energy for decades to come.”

By the 2050, the human population is expected to rise up to 10 billion people, which in hence, would double the demands for energy. What will this mean for the planet? “We won’t know until we open the door in 2050,” Lewis said. “We know at the rate we are going, assuming we conserve energy like never before, and if we have a pure natural gas economy, the carbon dioxide levels within our lifetime will be at least twice as high as anything that has been on our planet in the last million years.” We are at a point where we have to put money aside and do what is right for our planet for a change.

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Climate and Biodiversity Senior Project Brainstorm

At first, I was interested in showing how negatively the world would be effected if the plants and animals we take for granted became extinct. But now, I feel like I can go much deeper with that idea by tracing it back to the cause of their extinction known as climate change, to the raised levels of C02, and all the way to humanity. I feel that it would be interesting to show how people can effect mother nature and change the natural courses of our planet. “As the climate continues to warm, major changes may occur in ecosystem structure and function, species’ ecological interactions, and species’ geographic ranges, with predominantly negative consequences for biodiversity.”

Climate change has an effect on every aspect of our planet. A few degree change can mean consequences for our biodiversity. We are endangering the lives of many plants and animals because we are changing their natural habitat at such a fast rate, biodiversity does not have enough time to adapt. Climate change does not only hurt us, plants, and animals, but along with our water resources, natural disasters, and energy as well. “Human societies depend on ecosystems for the natural, cultural, spiritual, recreational and aesthetic resources they provide.”

In one of the articles I read, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reviewed relevant published studies of biological systems and found out that 20 %to 30% of species assessed may be at risk of extinction from climate change impacts within this century if global mean temperatures exceed 2-3 °C (3.6-5.4 °F) relative to pre-industrial levels. With the levels of CO2 rising, it is our duty to bring it back down and fix the mistakes we have made in the past. We have so many natural resources such as plants and animals that we take for granted and put at stake.“By 2100 ecosystems will be exposed to atmospheric CO2 levels substantially higher than in the past 650,000 years, and global temperatures at least among the highest as those experienced in the past 740,000 years. This will alter the structure, reduce biodiversity and perturb functioning of most ecosystems, and compromise the services they currently provide.”

In the documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” Al Gore presents his ideas across in a manner that I found highly affective. I have already began to brainstorm ideas for my senior project using similar tactics seen in the movie. I want to create my own documentary that is entertaining, insightful, informative, and inspiring. I want to show the public exactly what they are doing to our environment and take off the ignorant blind fold that our nation has covered our eyes with for so long. I feel that it is the right of the people to know why climate change this is a big issue, how it will affect our lives and the lives of other human beings, and what we can do to prevent it from getting worse.


Cites and Annotated Resources

Article 1

"Frequent Questions - Effects | Climate Change | U.S. EPA." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. N.p., 8 Sept. 2009. Web. 9 Feb. 2010. .

Good Quotes

“As the climate continues to warm, major changes may occur in ecosystem structure and function, species’ ecological interactions, and species’ geographic ranges, with predominantly negative consequences for biodiversity.”

What the Article was About

Climate change has an effect on every aspect of our planet. A few degree change can mean consequences for our biodiversity. We are endangering the lives of many plants and animals because we are changing their natural habitat at such a fast rate, biodiversity does not have enough time to adapt. Climate change does not only hurt us, plants, and animals, but along with our water resources, natural disasters, and energy as well.


Article 2

"Ecosystems and Biodiversity | Climate Change - Health and Environmental Effects | U.S. EPA." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. N.p., 8 Sept. 2009. Web. 11 Feb. 2010. .

Good Quotes

“Climate change is a factor that has the potential to alter ecosystems and the many resources and services they provide to each other and to society.”

“Human societies depend on ecosystems for the natural, cultural, spiritual, recreational and aesthetic resources they provide.”

“Climate is an integral part of ecosystems and organisms have adapted to their regional climate over time.”

“By 2100 ecosystems will be exposed to atmospheric CO2 levels substantially higher than in the past 650,000 years, and global temperatures at least among the highest as those experienced in the past 740,000 years. This will alter the structure, reduce biodiversity and perturb functioning of most ecosystems, and compromise the services they currently provide.”

What the Article was About

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reviewed relevant published studies of biological systems and found out that 20 %to 30% of species assessed may be at risk of extinction from climate change impacts within this century if global mean temperatures exceed 2-3 °C (3.6-5.4 °F) relative to pre-industrial levels. Biodiversity has such a huge impact on humanity because we depend on it for everything. With the levels of CO2 rising, it is our duty to bring it back down and fix the mistakes we have made in the past. We have so many natural resources such as plants and animals that we take for granted and put at stake.


Article 3

ScienceDaily. Retrieved February 11, 2010, from http://www.sciencedaily.com­ /releases/2009/01/090121091239.htm

Interesting Quotes

“The critical thing is to protect the forests surrounding the mountain, so that the lowland species are able to reach the cooler conditions that they may need,”

What the Article was About

Three undergraduates who studied moths on Mount Kinabalu in Borneo, initialized the new research that discovered that on average, the species had moved uphill by about 67 meters over the years to cope with changes in climate. That was the first demonstration that “climate change is affecting the distributions of tropical insects, the most numerous group of animals on Earth, thus representing a major threat to global biodiversity”. As the moths migrate higher up the mountain, they have less space and suitable habitats to thrive, resulting in the deaths of many moths.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Plant Write Up

I want to grow the Daylily flower.
  • Daylilies are rugged, adaptable, vigorous perennials that endure in a garden for many years with little or no care. Daylilies adapt to a wide range of soil and light conditions. They establish quickly, grow vigorously, and survive winters with little or no injury.
  • Daylilies can be planted almost any time the soil can be worked. Works in well-rooted manure or compost to increase organic matter. Fertilizer needs to be applied depending on a soil test. We have to dig a hole large enough for the roots without bending or crowding them.
  • The best time to transplant or divide plants is early spring. Plants divided in the spring may not bloom the same summer. Divisions should have two to three stems or fans of leaves with all roots attached. Divisions are made by digging the entire plant and gently pulling the fans apart, cutting the foliage back, and leaving only five or six inches. Once the plant is placed in the soil, its important to make sure that the crown (the portion where the stem and root meets) is one inch below the ground line. It need to be watered after planting. A winter mulch of straw or shredded leaves helps ensure against winter injury for unestablished plants.
  • Daylilies should be spaced no less than 18 to 24 inches apart on each side.
  • Daylilies can do well over a relatively wide soil pH range and adjustment of pH need only be considered if the plants appear to be doing poorly. A soil test as recommended and should always be conducted before amending with sulfur or lime.
  • Although daylilies are adaptable to most soils, they do best in a slightly acidic, moist soil that is high in organic matter and well drained.
  • Although daylilies tolerate drought, they perform best in moist, but well-drained soils. One inch of water weekly is ideal, more frequent watering may be necessary on sandy soils.
  • The genus Hemerocallis is native to Asia. Since the early 1930s, hybridizers in the United States and England have made great improvements in daylilies. Originally, the only colors were yellow, orange, and red. Today, we have colors ranging from near-whites, pastels, yellows, oranges, pinks, vivid reds, crimson, purple, nearly true-blue, and pretty blends. Many people are familiar with only the common yellow or orange daylilies which are often seen along roadsides. These daylilies are cultivated forms of the wild types of daylilies which have "escaped" and are growing as if they are wild. All the modern daylilies have been developed through a complicated history of hybridization among these and other wild types.

My Sources
http://www.daylilies.org/AHSfaq1.html#origin
http://www.extension.umn.edu/distribution/horticulture/DG1106.html